An investigation of the mass-market fashion design process
Journal Paper by Prabod Dharshana Munasinghe, D.G.K. Dissanayake and Angela Druckman
Research Journal of Textile and Apparel | August 2021
Summary
The process of fashion design varies between market segments, yet these variations have not yet been properly explored. This study aims to examine the fashion design process as practised at the mass-market level, as this is the most vibrant and the largest market segment in terms of production volumes and sales.
Methodology
It is observed that 15 semi-structured interviews were conducted with mass-market fashion designers. Key activities of the mass-market design process were identified and a comparative analysis was conducted with the general design process.
Findings
The mass-market design process is found to prioritise profits rather than aesthetic aspects, with the buyer exercising more power than the designer. This hinders creativity, which, in turn, may impede a move towards more environmentally benign designs.
The clothing industry is responsible for high environmental impacts and many of these impacts arise through decisions made in the design stage. In particular, the mass-market for clothing because of its high volume of sales and fast throughput, accounts for a great deal of the impact. However, little is understood about the design process that is practised in the mass-fashion market. This paper fills the gap by developing a framework that describes the mass-market design process. Understanding the design process will enable progress to be made towards achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 12: Responsible Consumption and Production.
The full paper can be downloaded with an institutional login via the Emerald website. If you have difficulties accessing the paper, please get in touch: info@cusp.ac.uk.
Citation
Munasinghe P D, Dissanayake D G K and A Druckman 2021. An investigation of the mass-market fashion design process. In: Research Journal of Textile and Apparel, Online, Aug 2021. https://doi.org/10.1108/RJTA-08-2020-0089.